Comparing two proposals: How do you spot the differences that matter?
You have two proposals for the same project, but they describe different services. Start by comparing them against the result you need: What should be finished, how often do you need it, and which work are you willing to do yourself? Then you can judge which price covers which scope.
A useful comparison shows what the documents confirm, what is missing and what you need to ask. You can prepare it yourself or ask an AI assistant to help. The following steps work for either approach.
Set your criteria before comparing
Describe your project in one sentence. Add three to five points that matter to you. Separate them into:
- Essential: Without this service, you cannot use the result.
- Preferred: Helpful, but not a reason to reject an otherwise suitable proposal.
- Your contribution: Materials, decisions or work you can provide yourself.
If you need finished copy, for example, a design service that requires you to supply the text is a different task. A broader proposal may still include services you do not need. What matters is your requirement, not the longest feature list.
Ask both documents the same questions
Record the version or date of each proposal. For every criterion, find the specific statement in the document and note the page or section beside it. This lets you return to the source later instead of relying only on a summary.
Check the deliverable, quantity, frequency, revisions, input required from you and delivery time. “Support included,” for instance, does not yet tell you which changes are covered or when you will receive a reply.
Use three clear labels: included, excluded and not stated. Missing information means neither “included at no extra cost” nor “unavailable.” If the proposal and its covering email contradict each other, record both statements as needing clarification. Do not decide for yourself which one probably applies.
A short example: a monthly newsletter
This example is fictional. You want a newsletter draft each month, based on your notes. Both the copy and design should be finished, and you need one shared round of revisions. You will send the newsletter yourself.
| Criterion | Proposal A | Proposal B |
|---|---|---|
| Writing | From your notes | You supply the text |
| Design | Included | Included |
| Revisions | One round included | Not stated |
| Frequency | Monthly | Price per issue |
A is therefore closer to your stated needs. A lower listed price for B would not settle the comparison: you would still be writing the copy, and the revision allowance is unclear. Ask B specifically whether writing and one revision round can be added, and what each monthly issue would then cost. Until the reply arrives, that part of the comparison remains open.
Separate one-off work from recurring costs
List setup, regular services and possible additional work separately. Also check whether any tools you need are included or must be paid for separately. Record whether amounts include or exclude tax so that you do not mix different pricing bases.
Use the same period and quantity for both proposals, such as six monthly issues. Add up only amounts you have confirmed apply to that scope. A price per issue is not automatically an all-inclusive monthly price, and an unspecified extra is not zero. Ask before treating a total as complete.
Also note the work left to you: writing copy, choosing pictures or entering content. Even without assigning a monetary value to it, you can see which tasks each proposal actually takes off your hands.
Give an assistant a focused comparison task
The relevant sections of the proposals and your criteria are enough to begin. Remove personal or confidential details that are unnecessary for the comparison. You do not need to connect your entire mailbox.
Compare these two proposals for this result: … . My essential criteria are … . I can handle … myself. Compare scope, input required from me, revisions, timing, and one-off and recurring costs for … . Give the source location for each detail. Flag missing or contradictory information. Separate facts from your assessment and draft the questions that matter to the decision. Prepare only the comparison; do not contact anyone or place an order.
Then read the key source passages yourself. Pay particular attention to quantities, periods and limitations. An AI assistant may overlook a footnote or present an assumption as a commitment. Ask it to correct an assessment that the documents do not support. The guide to getting started with your AI assistant shows how to make that feedback specific.
When personal assistance fits
If you regularly compare project documents, your criteria and clarified questions can give the next task a starting point. The useful result is a comparison you can trace back to its sources, with the answers still needed. A final choice can wait while an essential service remains unclear.
Bhalithan is the personal agent in Telegram with his own webspace, memory and email. PDFs and text attachments are also analysed in the personal pilot. Customer onboarding is being tested; the complete package is not yet generally available. We clarify which document tasks are ready for you before you start.
If these comparisons are a recurring task, tell us what you need help with. A general description is enough to begin; you do not need to send confidential proposals at this stage.